Banking interdependence and sovereign risk transmission: Evidence from the United States, Europe and the United Kingdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32826/reyf.v2i5.370Keywords:
Connectedness, Sovereign Debt, Spillovers, VolatilityAbstract
The objective of this work is to analyze the interdependence between the European, North American and English banking systems for the 2019-2024 period from a financial risk transmission perspective and the analysis of the transmission of sovereign risk from each area to its own banking system. Two methodological approaches have been used to accomplish these objectives. The first one is based on the estimation of VAR-BEKK-X and VAR-DCC-X models, and the well-known connectedness approach proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz. The results shed light on the fact that the European and English banking systems are highly interdependent, as shown by their high correlation, while the North American banking system and the former ones have a lower and more variable correlation. Ultimately, spillover effects were found among the three banking systems, although it was not possible to determine their direction, and, albeit weaker, spillovers also show up between sovereigns and banking.
References
Altavilla, C., Pagano, M., Simonelli, S., 2017. Bank Exposures and Sovereign Stress Transmission. Review of Finance 21, 2103–2139. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfx038
Apostolakis, G.N., Floros, C., Giannellis, N., 2022. On bank return and volatility spillovers: Identifying transmitters and receivers during crisis periods. International Review of Economics & Finance 82, 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREF.2022.06.009
Batten, J.A., Boubaker, S., Kinateder, H., Choudhury, T., Wagner, N.F., 2023. Volatility impacts on global banks: Insights from the GFC, COVID-19, and the Russia-Ukraine war. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 215, 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEBO.2023.09.016
Baziki, S.B., Nieto, M.J., Turk-Ariss, R., 2023. Sovereign portfolio composition and bank risk: The case of European banks. Journal of Financial Stability 65, 101108–101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFS.2023.101108
Bollerslev, T., Engle, R.F., Wooldridge, J.M., 1988. A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time-Varying Covariances. Journal of Political Economy 96, 116–131.
Bottero, M., Lenzu, S., Mezzanotti, F., 2020. Sovereign debt exposure and the bank lending channel: Impact on credit supply and the real economy. Journal of International Economics 126, 103328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103328
Caporin, M., Natvik, G.J., Ravazzolo, F., Santucci de Magistris, P., 2019. The bank-sovereign nexus: Evidence from a non-bailout episode. Journal of Empirical Finance 53, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.07.001
Chen, Y., Xu, J., Miao, J., 2023. Dynamic volatility contagion across the Baltic dry index, iron ore price and crude oil price under the COVID-19: A copula-VAR-BEKK-GARCH-X approach. Resources Policy 81, 103296–103296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2023.103296
Chen, Y., Zheng, B., Qu, F., 2020. Modeling the nexus of crude oil, new energy and rare earth in China: An asymmetric VAR-BEKK (DCC)-GARCH approach. Resources Policy 65, 101545–101545. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2019.101545
Chen, Z., Zheng, C., Hao, X., 2022. Volatility spillover effect between internet finance and banks. Journal of Business Research 141, 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.11.049
Choudhry, T., Jayasekera, R., 2014. Returns and volatility spillover in the European banking industry during global financial crisis: Flight to perceived quality or contagion? International Review of Financial Analysis 36, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRFA.2014.05.003
Diebold, F.X., Yilmaz, K., 2012. Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting 28, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006
Engle, R., 2002. Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20, 339–350.
Engle, R.F., Kroner, K.F., 1995. Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized Arch. Econometric Theory 11, 122–150.
Gomez-Puig, M., Singh, M.K., Sosvilla-Rivero, S., 2019. The sovereign-bank nexus in peripheral euro area: Further evidence from contingent claims analysis. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 49, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NAJEF.2019.03.021
Hosking, J.R.M., 1981. Equivalent Forms of the Multivariate Portmanteau Statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 43, 261–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1981.tb01179.x
Ibarz, M.A., Lobera, A.B., Santos, M.A.R., 2022. La curva de tipos y el nexo bancos-deuda pública. Cuadernos de Información económica 17–22.
Keddad, B., Schalck, C., 2020. Evaluating sovereign risk spillovers on domestic banks during the European debt crisis. Economic Modelling 88, 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2019.09.047
Koop, G., Pesaran, M.H., Potter, S.M., 1996. Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics 74, 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(95)01753-4
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y., 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
Lin, B., Wesseh Jr., P.K., Owusu Appiah, M., 2014. Oil price fluctuation, volatility spillover and the Ghanaian equity market: Implication for portfolio management and hedging effectiveness. Energy Economics 42, 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.12.017.
Lin, W., 2017. Modeling volatility linkages between Shanghai and Hong Kong stock markets before and after the connect program. Economic Modelling 67, 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.02.012
Ling, S., McAleer, M., 2003. Asymptotic theory for a vector ARMA-GARCH model. Econometric Theory 19, 280–310.
Ljung, G.M., Box, G.E.P., 1978. On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65, 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/65.2.297
McLeod, A.I., Li, W.K., 1983. Diagnostic checking ARMA time series models using squared-residual autocorrelations. Journal of Time Series Analysis 4, 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1983.tb00373.x
Mensi, W., Hammoudeh, S., Nguyen, D.K., Yoon, S.M., 2014. Dynamic spillovers among major energy and cereal commodity prices. Energy Economics 43, 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2014.03.004
Ongena, S., Popov, A., Van Horen, N., 2019. The Invisible Hand of the Government: Moral Suasion during the European Sovereign Debt Crisis. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 11, 346–79. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20160377
Pesaran, H.H., Shin, Y., 1998. Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters 58, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00214-0
Pesaran, M.H., 2015. Time Series and Panel Data Econometrics. OUP Oxford.
Sadorsky, P., 2012. Correlations and volatility spillovers between oil prices and the stock prices of clean energy and technology companies. Energy Economics 34, 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2011.03.006
Song, F., Cui, J., Yu, Y., 2022. Dynamic volatility spillover effects between wind and solar power generations: Implications for hedging strategies and a sustainable power sector. Economic Modelling 116, 106036–106036. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2022.106036
Zhao, H., Li, J., Lei, Y., Zhou, M., 2022. Risk spillover of banking across regions: Evidence from the belt and road countries. Emerging Markets Review 52, 100919–100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EMEMAR.2022.100919
Zheng, B., Zhang, Y.W., Qu, F., Geng, Y., Yu, H., 2022. Do rare earths drive volatility spillover in crude oil, renewable energy, and high-technology markets? — A wavelet-based BEKK- GARCH-X approach. Energy 251, 123951–123951. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2022.123951
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License that allows third parties to share the work whenever its author is indicated and its first publication is this magazine.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication is indicated in this magazine.
- Authors are allowed and advised to disseminate their work through the Internet (eg in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase the citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access ).